So you're referring to the bit that I explicitly stated right at the top, that I didn't readily have a source link for?
You're doubling down on looking foolish by angrily calling me deceptive while showing proof that I wasn't.
Also, what you linked doesn't contradict the particular data point I emphasized in what I read, as it doesn't compare suicidality between closeted and out trans people; it only compares the second and third groups I mentioned in my comment.
When it comes to the topics where there is overlap, my remembered source agrees with what you linked: that for trans people who are out, support is, obviously, going to reduce suicidality more than than lack of support.
The interesting/unexpected data point was that the rate was lower among trans people who never come out, than for either subset of trans people who have come out.
Calling me transphobic for mentioning that I read something that contradicts a commonly-held assumption, is toxic and anti-intellectual. If you want to disregard it because I can't back it up, that's perfectly understandable (hence my prefaced disclaimer, in the first place!), but there's no call for the hostility, at all. Relax.
As for me, I know what I read, and I'm confident I'm remembering it properly too because, guess what, it surprised me too, like I said! That's what made it stick with me for years, despite not having immediately meticulously recorded where I read it.
EDIT: You may also note that I drew literally ZERO conclusions based on said data point, only remarking on the apparent complexity it introduces to the topic.