jjjalljs comments on Mark Zuckerberg writes a manifesto on bringing AI "superintelligence" to everyone to improve humanity, but doesn't even define what superintelligence means.

Technology

89,627 readers

13,793 active

3,105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any ethical super intelligence would immediately remove billionaires from power. I'd like to see that.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago

Superintelligence doesn’t imply ethics. It could just as easily be a completely unconscious system that’s simply very, very good at crunching data.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

A superintelligence would likely quickly become the sovereign of the earth. And it's generally a good idea to kill the old elite after conquering a nation, then install new ones. The new ones will like you, because you made them rich, and they'll fear you, because you killed off all of their predecessors. Of course, there's also the risk that a super intelligence would just do away with humans in general. But anybody holding significant power right now is much more at risk.

And we can't forget that we currently can't even build something that's actually intelligent, and that a super intelligence might not actually be possible.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago

If AI ends up destroying us, I’d say it’s unlikely to be because it hates us or wants to destroy us per se - more likely it just treats us the way we treat ants. We don’t usually go out of our way to wipe out ant colonies, but if there’s an anthill where we’re putting up a house, we don’t think twice about bulldozing it. Even in the cartoonish “paperclip maximizer” thought experiment, the end of humanity isn’t caused by a malicious AI - it’s caused by a misaligned one.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent