▲ 347 ▼ Cisco (i.postimg.cc) submitted 1 year ago by irelephant@programming.dev to c/iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev 22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 28 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's still a QA issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) Design issue. The job of quality is to ensure that the item has been manufactured to meet all design criteria. A product with flaws in the design affecting the end user can still be made to high quality standards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderFreyja@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago It's both, designer/engineer should have known but a good QA team would have caught it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Can we compromise and say “design QA”? A poorly designed product is still a problem with “QA” even if it’s the design quality that is poor rather than manufacturing quality. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) Design issue. The job of quality is to ensure that the item has been manufactured to meet all design criteria. A product with flaws in the design affecting the end user can still be made to high quality standards. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderFreyja@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago It's both, designer/engineer should have known but a good QA team would have caught it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Can we compromise and say “design QA”? A poorly designed product is still a problem with “QA” even if it’s the design quality that is poor rather than manufacturing quality. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderFreyja@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago It's both, designer/engineer should have known but a good QA team would have caught it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Can we compromise and say “design QA”? A poorly designed product is still a problem with “QA” even if it’s the design quality that is poor rather than manufacturing quality. permalink fedilink source parent
