you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Whoa now, author sees a censoring filter as a most basic feature of a free and open chat infrastructure? It's not a social media client, you know? It was made for closed groups like governments and companies.

I use Fluffychat to talk with family and friends and for that it's good.

Edit: ok, looks like spam really is a problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Matrix is commonly used for public, discoverable rooms, much like IRC or Discord. Perhaps it's not good for that use case, but the author seems to wish it was.

    An effective spam prevention approach is a basic feature of any public communication service that reaches a certain size. Perhaps keyword filtering as the author suggests isn't the right approach, but some rate limits would help:

    • Private messages from a new contact could notify just once until approved instead of once per message.
    • Servers could limit the number of outstanding message requests, with a low limit for new accounts.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    After seeing the screenshot they posted of the barrage of notifications they received with repulsive group names/messages I can't say I blame them.

  • source
  • parent