The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So even though the footage previously release has been verified to be edited... you're just gonna believe that this allegedly complete footage exists... based on a CBS article with zero citations?

https://www.wired.com/story/the-fbis-jeffrey-epstein-prison-video-had-nearly-3-minutes-cut-out/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You're completely misunderstanding. The CBS source is confirming the non-edited version exists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I think this person is not misunderstanding at this point but using a very bizarre and unsuccessful strategy to attempt to save face after being correctly called out for not reading the article lol

    EDIT: LOL they've gone through my comment history and downvoted all of my comments...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    So even though the footage previously release has been verified to be edited... you're just gonna believe that this allegedly complete footage exists...

    It had to be edited from something...?

    Right now all we have is an unverified claim by CBS (Capitulation Broadcasting Systems) that just so happens to corroborate a Trump spokesman.

    Huh?? This does not corroborate a Trump spokesman, it's literally the opposite. Can you explain what made you think it corroborates a Trump spokesman?

  • source
  • parent