you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

they should be built/deployed at a capacity as its needed in order of minimizing waste

Building at capacity might not be the most efficient solution. First, towns grow. Second, China keeps costs down by standardisation (the Chinese HSR system has, if I remember correctly, 3 models of trains and two standards of track). And third, China is vulnerable to earthquakes and floods. So having alternative routes is useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    The issue specifically is that there is no population centres in which these unprofitable lines run through

    And no, government don’t and should burn thousands billions; and hundreds of millions in upkeep every year because what if maybe urbanization stops and people for whatever reason move back to the countryside

  • source
  • parent