you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

I bought an Xbox around launch because of the hype behind Halo and I wanted to give it a go. Still one of the most over rated crappy games in my opinion.

I played through the whole game and it just isnt good. Ive played the multiplayer many times and I just dont think it is fun. Why would I run around with fisher price guns when I could be playing Counter Strike or Unreal Tournament.

I still don't get the hype around Halo to this day, but k guess it just doesnt push the right buttons for me.

I think the 360 as a console was more revolutionary as well and really bought about proper online gaming for console. The original Xbox was just poor in comparison to the PS2 as far as I was concerned.

There is always plenty of rose tinted glasses when people look back on the consoles of their childhood, I love the Saturn even though objectively it is a bit crap. Likewise Xbox is mediocre as fuck and worked well enough to get them through to the powerhouse generation that was the 360.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 hours ago

    Well, for console players, an Xbox was the only way to play Counter Strike (which didn't release until years later and may not have been a priority without Halo's popularity), and Unreal Tournament came out in 2000 on PS2 and 2001 on Dreamcast, and those ports were pretty bad. What Halo did was bring the FPS experience to a controller, not just a console. Before that it was hit and miss with controllers and FPS games. Halo is where the layout really locked in.

    What matters even more is Halo 2 bringing things like matchmaking, parties, and playlists to FPS games. Without that, consoles would still be stuck on server lists. Would all of those innovations have happened without Halo? Would CoD and Battlefield be where they are now without Halo? Probably. But Halo is what brought them up.

    And you say that the 360 was where console online gaming really came into it, but Xbox Live on the original Xbox was amazing. Voice comms while playing Ghost Recon. MechAssault. Rainbow Six 3. The Dreamcast tried, but it never made the leap. The Xbox and the Halo series are what pushed consoles into a closer parity with PC gaming, and you can see how true it is just by looking at the offerings that Sony and Nintendo have made. Sony has caught up now, but it took them years longer to follow Microsoft's blueprint, and Nintendo still hasn't figured out how to do proper online gaming.

    If it isn't for you, it isn't for you, and that's fine. However, calling it over-rated and crappy is a pretty hot take. That's like booting up DOOM and saying, "Why bother, we already have Wolfenstein."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago (2 children)

    I bought the whole Halo collection (maybe one of those Humble Bundles, I don't remember) after hearing everyone raving online how great it is, not realizing that it was a console game.

    I was never a console gamer, because I hate walled gardens. Also, I prefer mouse and keyboard, having spent way too many hours on Doom, Quake and Half-life.

    Halo felt... weird. There were levels where you would go into nearly the same room (with small variations) to kill the exact same number and type of enemies.

    Some parts were fun, like the vehicles. But by then I'd already played Half-Life 2.

    I was underwhelmed by the whole thing, I did not even finish trying all the collection because of the huge amount of space it took on disk, even if you only wanted to play one of the games of the series.

    This is just the opinion of someone who is not into consoles. I'm sure that if I'd bought the console and this was the only game I had, I'd probably love it, warths and all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 hours ago

    Halo was incredible for it's time. While the original didnt hold up too well, Halo 2, 3 and Reach are still incredible experiences. They could make an entire movie out of Halo 2 and it's remastered cutscenes.

    It was like the Half-Life of consoles. I had some of the best times with friends playing Halo, so maybe I'm a bit biased from nostalgia, but they are some of the best games made, just raw fun. The set pieces were amazing, Bungie really knew what they were doing and for the time and the technical limitations, they smashed it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 hours ago

    There were levels where you would go into nearly the same room (with small variations) to kill the exact same number and type of enemies.

    That was shoehorned into the game last-minute to increase the play time. Lame but they had to get it out by launch.

    I was underwhelmed by the whole thing

    Yeah if you play it now it seems basic. But that’s like listening to the Beatles now and saying they aren’t very interesting, when everything current is based on what they did.

  • source
  • parent