664
abortolly problem (lemmy.ml)
submitted 12 hours ago by to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 9 hours ago (25 children)

If my mom had aborted me I wouldn't give a shit because I'd be dead.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
    •
  • [–] 34 points 9 hours ago (24 children)

    Ummm actually unborn and dead are two different things ☝️🤓

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 7 hours ago

    If it was alive and then isn't, it is dead. That's what dead means. A fetus that died in the womb is still dead, and died, and there is no other way to define what unborn is than to describe it as a previously living entity; thus dead.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 9 hours ago (22 children)

    A fetus is only a potential person, but it's still a living organism. After it's aborted, it's dead.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 8 hours ago (21 children)

    It's not yet a separate living organism, though. It can't continue living on its own.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

    This is why I don’t have house plants.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

    I just saw a post about abandoned greenhouses yesterday that says we don’t matter as long as water can get in 😊

    And water is very very good at finding a way in.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago (4 children)

    Well most certainly not into my plant pots

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    Let that roof decay and it will!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (2 children)

    I'm sure my plants will be long dead at that point, but I appreciate the optimism :)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (1 child)

    Consider getting yourself a tradescantia. Or several varieties.

    They look nice when given bright sun, clone very easily by just taking a cutting and putting it in water, and if you neglect them, they die from the root to the tip so you have tons of time to cut the tip off for a clone when you realize you fucked up. Like seriously months.

    You can also sell them for decent amounts because people don’t realize how neglect-proof they really are!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago

    I don’t think “it can’t continue living on its own” is a good measure of whether or not something is alive or a separate organism. Even after birth a baby human can’t “continue living on its own” without being provided for. A parasitic creature can’t “continue living on its own” without a host. A severely injured person can’t “continue living on its own” without life support. Pretty easy argument for even a stupid forced-birther to deconstruct.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago (6 children)

    This does not actually refute the claim that the fetus would be dead. I'm not actually sure if you're contesting anything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

    Can it be dead if it was never living?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago (4 children)

    Do you think women are conceiving intern minerals in their womb? What is this question xD I'm going to assume you're having a laugh, because by every metric a fetus is alive. If those cells are multiplying, consuming various stuff to continue multiplying; the fetus is alive. If the fetus, removed from its source of food, dies; it must be alive. If you removed me from all sources of food, I too would die.

    If you have a compelling argument, I'd love to hear it though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    My hand also consumes nutrients to live. Is it a separate living being from me?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago (2 children)

    Not separate, but it is a living thing. If you starved your hand off by constricting the blood flow, I don't think anyone would question you when you say your hand is dead.

    Actually isn't that literally called dying off in English?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    I think we're using 2 different meanings of "dead" here. There's "dead" as in "dead tissue" and "dead" as in "corpse". My point was that a fetus fits the first meaning of "dead", but not the second. You can't "kill" a fetus.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    I don't really think we are. A corpse is also just dead tissue after all. I don't think there's a significant difference in semantics here.

    At the end of the day I don't think we should be debating the meaning of the words, just what we think they represent.

    The main difference (to me) is when it's a separate living being. I would definitely call a just-conceived foetus "alive", but it's not an individual yet, and I would have no issue with aborting it.

    Also I do want to make clear I'm very pro-abortion. I'm just autistic and get triggered by "misinformation" (this isn't misinformation but again my autistic ass can't think of the proper term).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

    True, but only due to current technology. With an artificial womb it would eventually develop into a person, unlike, say, an organ.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

    I mean, with cloning technology any cells could develop into a person. Doesn't mean we should count my hand as a separate living thing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

    A fetus is considerably further along than just a random cell. I don't think it's unreasonable to make a distinction there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •