▲ 214 ▼ Courage (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 day ago by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 160 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 hours ago (5 children) Nope, not what i said or what i believe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children) Nope, not what i said or what i believe. Also you: I dont care who goes first untill they are all gone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 5 hours ago (3 children) That is what i said yes, and i mean it. You just fail to take it literally and keep adding slander to it. You welcome the dismantlement of governments that oppose your empire Its that continued addition that i somehow want one global power to win first that’s bothering me cause its not true at all. I want all of them to lose, preferably at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children) That is what i said yes, and i mean it. You just fail to take it literally and keep adding slander to it. What it literally means is that you would welcome the governments that oppose your empire to fall, even if your empire does not. If the only development of events that you would like is for all governments to magically be undone in one moment simultaneously, you do not have anything of merit to say. Its that continued addition that i somehow want one global power to win first that’s bothering me cause its not true at all. I want all of them to lose, preferably at the same time. They can't lose at the same time, and supporting the dismantlement of your empire first would mean supporting the governments that oppose it. You have said that you do not support any governments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 hours ago (1 child) You do not need to support a state to oppose a state. Revolution is powered by people. Not authorites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago Cheering for the destruction of states in the Global South while NATO exists - which is what you promote - is simply support for NATO. Also, do you think that revolutions are not powered by violence and threat thereof in order to enforce one group's will upon another, i.e. by being authoritarian? And no, waiting for a few centuries and doing nothing to oppose your empire is not a serious approach to tackling colonialism. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children) Nope, not what i said or what i believe. Also you: I dont care who goes first untill they are all gone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 5 hours ago (3 children) That is what i said yes, and i mean it. You just fail to take it literally and keep adding slander to it. You welcome the dismantlement of governments that oppose your empire Its that continued addition that i somehow want one global power to win first that’s bothering me cause its not true at all. I want all of them to lose, preferably at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children) That is what i said yes, and i mean it. You just fail to take it literally and keep adding slander to it. What it literally means is that you would welcome the governments that oppose your empire to fall, even if your empire does not. If the only development of events that you would like is for all governments to magically be undone in one moment simultaneously, you do not have anything of merit to say. Its that continued addition that i somehow want one global power to win first that’s bothering me cause its not true at all. I want all of them to lose, preferably at the same time. They can't lose at the same time, and supporting the dismantlement of your empire first would mean supporting the governments that oppose it. You have said that you do not support any governments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 hours ago (1 child) You do not need to support a state to oppose a state. Revolution is powered by people. Not authorites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago Cheering for the destruction of states in the Global South while NATO exists - which is what you promote - is simply support for NATO. Also, do you think that revolutions are not powered by violence and threat thereof in order to enforce one group's will upon another, i.e. by being authoritarian? And no, waiting for a few centuries and doing nothing to oppose your empire is not a serious approach to tackling colonialism. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 5 hours ago (3 children) That is what i said yes, and i mean it. You just fail to take it literally and keep adding slander to it. You welcome the dismantlement of governments that oppose your empire Its that continued addition that i somehow want one global power to win first that’s bothering me cause its not true at all. I want all of them to lose, preferably at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children) That is what i said yes, and i mean it. You just fail to take it literally and keep adding slander to it. What it literally means is that you would welcome the governments that oppose your empire to fall, even if your empire does not. If the only development of events that you would like is for all governments to magically be undone in one moment simultaneously, you do not have anything of merit to say. Its that continued addition that i somehow want one global power to win first that’s bothering me cause its not true at all. I want all of them to lose, preferably at the same time. They can't lose at the same time, and supporting the dismantlement of your empire first would mean supporting the governments that oppose it. You have said that you do not support any governments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 hours ago (1 child) You do not need to support a state to oppose a state. Revolution is powered by people. Not authorites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago Cheering for the destruction of states in the Global South while NATO exists - which is what you promote - is simply support for NATO. Also, do you think that revolutions are not powered by violence and threat thereof in order to enforce one group's will upon another, i.e. by being authoritarian? And no, waiting for a few centuries and doing nothing to oppose your empire is not a serious approach to tackling colonialism. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children) That is what i said yes, and i mean it. You just fail to take it literally and keep adding slander to it. What it literally means is that you would welcome the governments that oppose your empire to fall, even if your empire does not. If the only development of events that you would like is for all governments to magically be undone in one moment simultaneously, you do not have anything of merit to say. Its that continued addition that i somehow want one global power to win first that’s bothering me cause its not true at all. I want all of them to lose, preferably at the same time. They can't lose at the same time, and supporting the dismantlement of your empire first would mean supporting the governments that oppose it. You have said that you do not support any governments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 hours ago (1 child) You do not need to support a state to oppose a state. Revolution is powered by people. Not authorites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago Cheering for the destruction of states in the Global South while NATO exists - which is what you promote - is simply support for NATO. Also, do you think that revolutions are not powered by violence and threat thereof in order to enforce one group's will upon another, i.e. by being authoritarian? And no, waiting for a few centuries and doing nothing to oppose your empire is not a serious approach to tackling colonialism. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 hours ago (1 child) You do not need to support a state to oppose a state. Revolution is powered by people. Not authorites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago Cheering for the destruction of states in the Global South while NATO exists - which is what you promote - is simply support for NATO. Also, do you think that revolutions are not powered by violence and threat thereof in order to enforce one group's will upon another, i.e. by being authoritarian? And no, waiting for a few centuries and doing nothing to oppose your empire is not a serious approach to tackling colonialism. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago Cheering for the destruction of states in the Global South while NATO exists - which is what you promote - is simply support for NATO. Also, do you think that revolutions are not powered by violence and threat thereof in order to enforce one group's will upon another, i.e. by being authoritarian? And no, waiting for a few centuries and doing nothing to oppose your empire is not a serious approach to tackling colonialism. permalink fedilink source parent
