Oh have I? Quote me. Where did I say that?

Here:

but we do not agree on the means, the justification of violence, and the authoritarianism needed to oppose it. We are also not friends.

All one needed was to scroll up.

You love a good argument fallacy, don’t you?

You sure do love referring to fallacies, but you don't even know what they are.

But regardless I did not say that there are not time where violence is necessary and called for. Revolution, fighting oppression, and defense of self and others are all perfectly reasonably justifications for violence.

Okay, and which cases of usage of violence do you disagree with "tankies" on?

What are your positions on the justification of violence. I will assume you also support revolution, as that seems to be your implication. But what about, say, the Chistka/The Great Purge? Or Red August/Sweeping Away All Monsters and Demons (Héngsǎo Yīqiè Niúguǐ Shéshén)? What is your opinion of those events?

Not well informed enough on those to conclude one way or another, and it's entirely possible that the measures should have been less severe.

Are you serious? I just quoted that. The selective reading comprehension is impressive, honestly.

Those were not my misrepresentations of your arguments. That was me claiming that you were not truthful about those claims. Those were not arguments to be misrepresenting any of yours, so those are not instances of strawmanning.

Allow me to repeat myself. I contest that. I refute that. That is bullshit. Clear enough?

Any examples of "tankies" being called so over matters where they were being incorrect?