you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

Without taking sides in this debate, let me just say that you'd have an easier time arguing that "slurs are sometimes okay to say" than trying to argue that "'retard' isn't a slur".

It's like, 100% a slur. You know how ethnic slurs are called ethnic slurs? That's because there are non-ethnic kinds. Really curious what definition you use for slur that wouldn't include "retard". It's an old-timey word used to describe a specific type of person, which is now largely considered offensive by that type of person, and has become used in a general sense as an insult...I mean, what box does it not check?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    personally i do consider it a slur and avoid it accordingly, but i think the difference with this one is that colloquial usage took it over entirely. i'm fairly sure the average person does not think of down syndrome when they hear that slur, they just think of a particularly stupid person. which is also how the words "idiot" and "dumb" stopped being slurs over time, even though those also used to refer to medical conditions.

    this might differ between cultural backgrounds, i suspect that's why it was categorised as a slur in contemporary internet culture. but it's pretty hard to find another slur that doesn't unambiguously, inseparably refer to a particular group it degrades. with the r-slur, some people do appear to separate it, i think that's why they insist it's okay to use.

  • source
  • parent