Better-received by experts, that is!

Or is the book actually well-regarded on the whole and still worth reading despite the criticisms? I'm not in a position to know, unfortunately, as I'm an uneducated schmuck.

Thank you!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 2 days ago

I think any work that tries to compress all of the worlds human history into short digestable points is going to have to simolifynthings in a way that doesn't satisfy academics in various fields. It's an enjoyable read and has some food points to make.

Would I consider it an accurate reference material? No, but I don't think the author would want me to, either.

It's like freakonomics. It is both true and not 100% accurate at the same time.

  • source
  • parent