Better-received by experts, that is!

Or is the book actually well-regarded on the whole and still worth reading despite the criticisms? I'm not in a position to know, unfortunately, as I'm an uneducated schmuck.

Thank you!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 2 days ago*

I mean he is an academic but not a historian. Came here to recommend those Mann books though, they're excellent and he's a better writer/researcher.

  • source
  • parent