you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

To quote them:

We are still in a fast development cycle, so the versioning is to keep track of the progress/iteration of the project. When a stable release is reached (2?), then any breaking change would require more proper major version changes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Yes, I understand they have declared that. Their declaration does not, however, negate the common semantic versioning standards, found at semver.org. These common standards are significant for admins running shared systems where they automatic upgrade processes based on common semantic versioning rules. The software will stabilize and they will adopt a more stringent policy. But they should still be releasing 0.x versions since they've not yet reached it.

  • source
  • parent