Hi! I am working on a website akin to steamdb but for categorizing games on their AI use in the following

Categories:

  • Handcrafted: The game has been confirmed untouched by GenAI
  • Tainted: Gen AI has been used in any aspect of this game's creation. Any usage of the technology puts you in this category.
  • Slop: Use of Gen AI is outwardly visible by players
  • Fraud: Developer lied about AI involvement in their products.

How the system would work:

It'd be a comunity driven, honor based effort. Users would summit reports and a group of trusted moderators would validate them.

Why I'm making this post:

I am looking for possible questions, problems, challenges and ideas you guys might come up with. I have a "Questions and answers" section down bellow with what I'd cover up myself.

Questions and answers

What counts as GenAI?

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, Claude, Deepseek, etc. Image generation models line Nano Banana, Stable diffusion, etc.

Why take such a harsh stance on GenAI?

AI use has been irrevocably tied to the problems it creates. It's being used as a tool to centralize power away from artists and creators towards a select few people with too much money on their hands.

Using AI is analogous to accepting all of the valid concerns against it and endorsing the problems it's wedged themselves in.

What counts as AI usage?

Any personal use by you or anyone you are in charge of on the project. It's the duty of the person in charge to ensure that your work stays human.

"I use local models I'd be allowed in handcrafted"

You're still furthering the use of a technology designed to steal and plagiarize. While local models address some of the enviromental problems of GenAI it's still an active endorsement of the theft done to train such models.

"I barely used GenAI for my game"

You made the choice to use GenAI on your game. You might have not been aware of the consequences of such choice but it's still a choice you made.

"My game has been tagged tainted even though I made it all"

This is a community effort, I'm sorry if you've been falsely targeted/tagged. There's always going to be bad actors. Contact the website at support@website.com and we'll do our best to rectify the error.

"Why shouldn't I just not disclose that I used GenAI"

No one's forcing you to disclose the use of such technology but it's something customers care about letting your customers make informed choices is how you build a reputation of quality and honesty.

"Why shouldn't I just lie about my GenAI use?"

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/fraud

Appart from that we have a special category reserved for this fraud. This is a website built around an honor system of reputation, do not tarnish it with abuse.

nerdspeakAnd with that the mess of ideas and html I've been messing with is out. My progress is slow but I'm making steps. The tech stack is based on the human-centric language zig, using a jsx-like framework named ziex, which I've been thoroughly enjoying. I plan on making the website fully open source but there's very little to showcase just yet. I'm just here to bounce ideas with the open web.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Re mistagged games, I think you may be opening yourself up to lawsuits, especially if this project succeeds in driving sales away from slop. Just look at Reddit as a cautionary tale of what community moderation can lead to: power tripping and astroturfing.

I'm all for something like this, but practically speaking I think it's more effective to have store fronts force AI disclosure on store pages (and add filtering functionality). If a developer lies about it, they may be liable for false advertising. It's also just more useful for consumers to have this information at the point of purchase (a browser extension could pull this off)

Itch.io recently added an AI disclosure category to all games, and I think it's a good start.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 12 hours ago* (1 child)

    Mind expanding on the lawsuit part? So, a game gets incorrectly tagged and the maker sues over contacting first?

    Edit: I might have to think up ways of making clear that the liability lays on the reporter, not the platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 hours ago

    This idea is basically a dedicated product review website, which is nothing new, but AFAIK there are precautions you need to take as the site operator to avoid liability for false/defamatory statements posted by users.

    I'm not a lawyer, so maybe talk to one before you launch lol

  • source
  • parent