you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 day ago* (4 children)

You are saying the decision doesn't make sense. But the correct way to put it is that it doesn't make sense to you.

Yes, that much is implied...who else would I be talking about?

People have different standards of judging what they deem harmful/suitable for the community/worth the effort

Yes and those standards are not all the same. Some of them are bad. This one is bad. If you want to provide a counterargument we can debate whether it's bad. Go ahead.

try to find out what the reasoning

The reasoning was already explained before I got here. The reasoning is what I said didn't make sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 14 hours ago (3 children)

    I'll go ahead:

    Why is it bad?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 13 hours ago (2 children)

    I explained in my original reply

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago (1 child)

    It says:

    That doesn't make any sense. You would think the people of the fedi would understand basic concepts of freedom. Freedom can be used for good or bad. Odysee has good and bad videos. As does YouTube, Instagram, and every other platform. If you want to ban videos, ban the videos. Banning an entire platform is nonsense. All you're doing is reinforcing YouTube's monopoly.

    That gives no explanation to why some standard unspecified by you is bad.

    Why is the standard bad, in your opinion?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment