you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm paranoid and I don't consider that as a possibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    You don't think someone would take a picture of a doctored picture?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (3 children)

    How and why would this happen? I'm honestly confused.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    To convince people that something happened....

    This isn't a theoretical, people have been manipulating photos from the start

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    To link back to the original spirit of the post: would that be something that people returning to non-digital photography immediatly resort to, considering such individuals would be striving to remove themselves from generated images?

    I'm not afraid to say it: I'd have the technology destroyed and banned tomorrow if I could. Image generation will cause a lot of damage in a near future. Many will have their lives destroyed because of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    OP said:

    holy grail of evidence in the age of AI and deepfakes?

    You said basically the same thing:

    hard evidence the image was not tampered with or generated.

    And analog photography is not evidence because it's easy to fake and that applies to the negatives, too

  • source
  • parent