you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (4 children)

What is this bullshit title? The article is even worse.

This is like 1950s mentality. She isn't going to earn anything, she is not getting a windfall.

She is a partner in their life marriage arrangement, and if the other partner leaves they will need to split up the partnership.

How much remains to be seen, and negotiations will occur, but unless a pre-nuptial, she already has this.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

    She isn’t going to earn anything, she is not getting a windfall.

    California is a community property state. That means she is entitled to half of their combined wealth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Yes, that's my point. She is not getting a windfall, she already has it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments