No, it's not a 2 hour long epic poem of toilet speak, although maybe it sort of feels that way. I think it's intellectual, maybe it's pseudo-intellectual nonsense, maybe it's "I'm 14 and this is deep" intellectual masturbation, I'm a philistine and an idiot and I can't always tell the difference. I'm not going to pretend I'm qualified to thoroughly review or vet the material, but it really seems like it's trying to be intelligent and actually discuss serious things. At one point he equates Skibidi toilet to digital brutalism, for example, as an art form that is intended to be unpleasant as part of its artistic notion. He seems to be, facetiously most likely, posing the argument that in a way we are already serving the machine god and the algorithm and this is what all humanity's history of progress has brought us to, this is what our idealized machine god considers art. And if we don't like it... I think maybe he's trying to imply that maybe we should reconsider our pursuit of the machine god. But it's kind of over my head, to be honest.