you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Wouldn't that just lead to no sane casino operator being incorporated in an EU member state?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    despite all the propaganda in the US and elsewhere, that's not how regulation works. they might make it a bit more inconvenient (in this case they could require you to prove that you are in a state where they have the license) but business don't just close up when they are regulated. states are never motivated to regulate businesses unless the damage they do otherwise is too big and businesses, generally, just find ways to work within the regulation. if a "business" has to close after regulation it usually means it was doing something so shady that all their customers/victims are better off without it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 20 hours ago

    I agree with the regulation, I'm just dubious that any gamber can successfully sue for their losses back.

    The more friction, the better. I just don't believe anyone will successfully win a case in practice (thanks to casinos being scared away by that clause).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    Online casino operators could just region block countries, and require customer citizenship in a country they are legally allowed to operate in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 20 hours ago

    It's clear that it won't happen though for the worst offenders. I don't have any disagreements with the EU's regulation, just dubious that affected customers could sue for their losses back if online casino operators have methodology to circumvent the clause (using cryptocurrency, not bothering with KYC, etc...).

  • source
  • parent