you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 day ago* (9 children)

I mean… the sentiment may not be wrong, but how is this a conspiracy? Or β€œslop”? The affair appears to be real, and the sell-off was real too; it exists without anyone inventing this story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    Because it's just not news, or important. If the CEO of Stellantis slept with a Canadian CEO to get better prices on steel, is that news worthy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Indeed. I guess the question I’m asking is β€œwhat leverage was exercised,” as it appears Nvidia has always acted in their own interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Nvidia has always acted in their own interest.

    Legally. But those chips were illegal to directly sell to China. Huang and Huang have put nvidia at huge risk, which has lost people billions in investments, which places nvidia at a legal liability from stockholders. There will be a class action, whether a corrupt DOJ does anything or not about the smuggling.

    You can't just fuck around with side hustles as CEO of a public company. Does Huang think he's the President?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (5 children)

    If the CEO of Stellantis slept with a Canadian CEO to get better prices on steel, is that news worthy?

    Poor analogy. It would be newsworthy if Canada had a sanction to not sell the steel to Stellantis. You seem to be glossing over the criminal activity pretty thick on your agenda of an innocent affair.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    'Criminal' activity usually involves a victim. There is no victim here. There's a good chance the sanction was in fact not legal anyway, but even if it was... do we really need news every time someone commits a minor civil offense? Should I be publishing a newspaper every time someone in China uses the pirate bay?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (3 children)

    'Criminal' activity usually involves a victim.

    Criminal is defined as violating laws designated as crimes. Not if there's a victim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Crimes without victims are pretty much always looked on as unjust when that society falls; and generally speaking have no place in modern society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 23 hours ago* (1 child)

    I see no way that couldnt be abused either depending on who you call a victim /s. See trans panic defense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 22 hours ago

    In the trans panic defense, there is still a victim alleged. (Wrongly) the man believes he is a victim of fraud, which lead him to harm the trans woman.

    In victimless crimes, there is no possible victim to allege. There is no actual victim from sanctions violations that are designed to cause indiscriminate social harm.

  • source
  • parent