you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

I have no evidence to support it, but I feel those two things are linked. Everything I described can be run on a smart phone so the only reason they need a server that can brick the device is to use it to harvest data. In which case, the toy is second to the spyware and probably deserves be bricked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 23 hours ago

    Even putting a cheap smartphone SoC would take the gadget out of the kind of price range people are prepared to pay for a toy. And yes in products like this the hardware is usually subsidised and ultimately paid for with data harvesting.

  • source
  • parent