For years, Missouri Republicans worked to undo or restrict voter-approved laws and amendments. In passing Amendment 6, voters have not only protected the ballot initiative process but also dramatically strengthened their power over the legislature.

Across the country on Tuesday, voters delivered a wave of Democratic victories, flipping seats in Congress as well as state legislatures, and weakening a number of Republican majorities.

Missouri was no exception. Democrats made significant gains in the state House, picking up 16 seats, though Republicans still hold every statewide office and maintain control of the legislature.

Nonetheless, the election was more than just a rebuke of Donald Trump. It reflected a long-simmering frustration with Missouri politicians who, time and again, have sought to override the will of voters — a practice that has intensified under years of Republican control. What’s more, voters went beyond weakening the Republican majority. They approved a constitutional amendment that curtailed the powers of the legislature and shifted more authority directly to the people.

Amendment 6, approved by a decisive margin, sharply limits the legislature’s ability to overturn laws and constitutional amendments enacted through citizen initiatives, and its ability to revive laws voters rejected through referendums.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Meanwhile in WA state it's the courts that overturn initiatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

    Hopefully they overturn this latest anti-trans dumpster fire of an initiative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    They going to overturn the other two initiatives too? The hypocrisy coming from people like you is at MAGA levels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 9 hours ago

    The anti trans initiative is going to have a lot of issues since it is poorly written and discriminates against girls, since girls are required to get certification of their sex before they’re allowed to play sports but boys have no such restrictions.

    Expecting legislation to be constitutional is not hypocritical on my part since I have not advocated for other unconstitutional legislation.

    I suppose we’re lucky that the dumbass who wrote these god awful initiatives is terrible at writing legally defenceable legislation.

    Regardless, your “people like you” coment is rude as hell.

  • source
  • parent