A marvellous idea!

Send it to your anti-bike lane friends from Toronto. 🤣

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

I saw a comment from another person on here not to long ago talking about their only car having their engine explode on them.

Anyways the comment was them realizing they did not have $30,000 to $50,000 just laying around to purchase a brand new car. A car that they realized they don't use much outside of a 50km radius around their house, and that they only purchased the car to be able to get to work because there are not other options avaliable. How is this considered freedom.

Most people don't realize, but owning a car is in some cases something that can push a chunk of the population into poverty. Or at the very least cause people to choose between purchasing food, or gasoline.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    I totally hear you and I agree, cars do push people into poverty quite often. I'm asking to not lose sight of the poor people who'd suffer more due to measures often proposed with good intentions.

    If a person cannot get to work without a car, their life becomes more miserable after being unable to afford a reliable means to get to work.

    Laws against idling are great but what is a person living in their vehicle supposed to do in the winter?

  • source
  • parent