-40
Far-left Democrats ran worse than moderates in 2026 midterms (lite.cnn.com)
submitted 21 hours ago by to c/politics@lemmy.world
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The 2026 midterm election showed that leftists like Michigan Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed — and even candidates who have been affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America — can win in competitive areas of the country, under the right circumstances.

But it also showed the danger of nominating candidates like them.

Many of them won, but they also often ran worse than other Democrats — and even further behind some of the party’s most moderate candidates.

The results clearly illustrate that nominating more moderate candidates remains the most fruitful path to winning swing seats and states. And they suggest candidates like El-Sayed could cost Democrats in less-wavey elections.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 21 hours ago

Does the author realize that everyone ran on Mamdani's affordability platform?

And wisely so. To their credit, moderates realized it was the right campaign strategy, so they embraced it. However, it's hard to say how many of them actually give a shit about affordability. I think it's likely at least some Democrats only put on the mask of an economic populist, and as soon as it's politically convenient, the mask will come off. Which is what the moderate Dem voters are counting on. They have nothing but disdain for economic populism, but they were willing to pretend like they loved it to win back power.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent