you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They got way too ambitious. Not only did they require a 1-state solution (not even Hamas go that far) but they also mandated that whatever solution would only be valid if ratified by a vote by… the members of the Green Party of England and Wales. The arbiters of peace. Essentially sabre rattling and backdoor colonialism. Not a realistic motion, and ripe for ridicule.

Then theres the slight embarrassment that the person they chose to formally present the motion at congress is an unapologetic and vocal supporter of a convicted Al-Quaeda member currently serving time at His Majesty’s Pleasure for terrorism offences.

  • source
  • parent