you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child)

There's nothing in the Constitution that gives the President immunity from prosecution, but the Supreme Court ruled that it is there.

As for gerrymandering... there are laws against gerrymandering, but the Supreme Court threw them out, except under conditions that are both vague and impossible to achieve. Unless the state legislature is literally twisting their mustaches and saying, "we are drawing a map to deny you representation" while tying a black person to train tracks the law has been invalidated.

And while you may personally agree with their decision the fact that the laws stood and were fine with decades of Supreme Court scrutiny shows that it is not a simple matter of states running their own elections.

As for the "no states having compact", I expect the Supreme Court to come up with some justification even if Congress allows it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    And while you may personally agree with their decision

    Let's be clear I don't. I just think the court isn't as unpredictable as people assume. They will continue to make terrible terrible decisions, but the logic behind them is clear. I seriously doubt they will do the more extreme things like change election results that people seem to believe

  • source
  • parent