I’ll start it off:

  • Windows is a perfectly fine OS, as long as you use Enterprise or Server (Home and Pro are crap)
  • Self driving cars are the future since the US won’t fully embrace mass transit
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's ok to fundamentally disagree with someone and still be civil and polite when speaking with them.

Depends on whar you disagree about. Economic policy, art, media, normal politics ? Sure.

But if the fundamental disagreement is whether certain groups of people deserve basic human rights, then no. Fuck them and everything they stand for, I fucking refuse to be polite or cordial towards people who fundamentally think my girlfriend doesn't deserve the right to exist just because of her innate identity.

Lemmy, and the fediverse, is stronger with diverse people, opinions, communities - even if you disagree with them. Even normies of mainstream political parties you disagree with.

Again, depends on what opinions they are disagreeing on

Downvotes are not a disagree button. Lemmy is not training a personal algorithm to provide a echo chamber, downvotes should mean content is harmful to the community its in.

Yes they are, that's the literal fucking point of upvotes and downvotes, to signal whether you like or dislike something, the appropriate tool to deal with actual harmful content is reporting and blocking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    quite a few people on here disagree about whether or not billionaires should have human rights and don't get any pushback at all, There is no difference between hating billionaires and hating any other wealth defined category of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment