you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

You vote for the lesser of two evils because one of the two will win no matter what you do, there's no third option that you can take -to VERY clear- on election day.

If they both want the exact same anti-trans policies (unlikely, I'm not even sure what race that might be) you can find some of the other important policies that differentiate them.

Then you fight like hell to have better options next time in the other 364 days of the year (usually 2 or more years in between). Or if you don't think democracy works do whatever it is you want to do to get your way and, unironically, godspeed.

I think the most sickening line people pull is that voting like this for a candidate is some sort of moral reflection of you. It is literally taking elections more seriously than the voters they pretend to be above. It's just 20 minutes of a random day to try and get fewer bad results than the alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Here is an article with further links on that happening with either candidates espousing anti-trans view points.

    https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/09/dems-with-anti-trans-views-are-on-the-ballot-what-should-pro-trans-voters-do-with-them/

    The link to the candidates in question: https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/the-guide-to-anti-trans-democrats

    I am tired of human rights being considered a negotiable topic.

    Edit: As well two propositions in Colorado that are anti-trans were passed. It's still an issue even with Democratic voters and I don't want people to lose sight of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    This isn't really a response to my post...

    I never said there weren't Democrats that are anti-trans. I said on election day one of the two candidates are going to win.

    Edit: I suppose my one like could have been clearer. I did not mean both candidates would support any of the exact same anti-trans policies. They would have to support all of the exact same anti-trans policies. The way I worded it was vague I'll admit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment