A group representing nearly all major automakers on Monday, Nov. 2 urged U.S. lawmakers to pass a permanent ban on Chinese vehicles when they return next week for a quick session after the midterm congressional elections.

In September, the Senate sponsors of the bipartisan effort to ban Chinese vehicles agreed to delay an effort to fast-track the bill until November despite overwhelming support.

Some congressional aides and auto lobbyists think if Democrats win control of Congress there may not be enough time to approve the Chinese vehicle ban before this session ends in December.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 53 points 3 days ago (11 children)

They can’t make cars under $20000 and only Slate can potentially make an EV under $25000. They can’t handle higher fuel economy standards. They can’t figure out how to sell anything other than trucks.

So why do they need to ban cars that they have no appetite to build?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    you answered your own question, they cant compete

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    No, they can compete, they just refuse to and chose to go the regulatory capture route insteae.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago

    They really can't actually compete. The upfront costs to make a factory and assembly line and all that automation {or human labor) is astronomically higher in price and slower in build in the US, compared to China. There really is no way the US can compete with China on pricing in manufacturing vehicles.

    Which is why it should just be left to die off instead of propping up the industry that moved half their plants to Mexico, anyhow.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)