you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 4 days ago (11 children)

Yet to read the article, but the headline makes it sound like it wasn't already full of asset flips, lazily made AI contents being an extension to those.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    Alternatively, you could read the article and know for sure what it actually says.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    It's a strategy of manipulation to write a headline in a way that headline readers will get the wrong idea despite the headline technically not being wrong, and also making people that do read the article to already hop in with a bias.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    The headline is there solely to get you to read the article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Doesn't make it less of a venue for such strategies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    Interestingly if you do want to know there's a neat article attached to the headline that has information on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Quoting my other reply:

    It's a strategy of manipulation to write a headline in a way that headline readers will get the wrong idea despite the headline technically not being wrong, and also making people that do read the article to already hop in with a bias.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    And it was stupid the first time you said it too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments