you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What was

a $8.9 billion investment in US chipmaker Intel

Is now

the value of the government’s 9.9 percent equity stake crashed from almost $40 billion to well under $30 billion

, still an unrealized 200%+ gain, so I guess the government "bought the dip" in a way. Though why Republicans back their favourite President engaging in casual nationalization still baffles me. Maybe any Democratic president should employ a similar path to nationalization disguised as a bailout: to legislatively constrict the business model of any company they want to acquire at discount "market rates", then restore something along previous regulatory conditions.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    The dip was also largely trumps fault for with holding money that had already been promised to Intel from the chips act, despite Intel having already spent a bunch of their own money on building new production lines.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    It’s to get chip fab in the US. Taiwan is not a stable place for the advanced chips the US and rest of the world rely on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Are you saying the US is a stable place for the rest of the world to rely on? We really haven't been for the past decade, at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments