you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The thing is: A lot of that stuff isn't going to happen any time soon and factory fishing is happening - it is a reality. Reducing the harm it causes still seems like a net good to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago

    Reducing the harm simple keeps the system running longer. See welfare states and capitalism, and what Europe is undergoing now even though they made capitalism more tolerable (for their people at least, the global south still gets raped as hard).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child)

    I understand where you are coming from, I just think that harm reduction in a system that will still cause harm is the wrong way to achieve change. I guess it is just two different ways to tackle a problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 7 points 5 days ago

    If you can figure out a way to get things to actually change, great, but the problem is that doesn't seem to be happening. Ultimately: Mitigating is better than not mitigating, at least until people find a way to truly shift to a more sustainable means.

  • source
  • parent