▲ 227 ▼ Need for Speed Underground 2 now runs in your browser, with thousands in online free roam (www.tweaktown.com) submitted 1 week ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca 52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 43 points 1 week ago (6 children) Because you might click the link and leave the news site. Source: worked in the industry, literally told this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 point 1 week ago (5 children) Publisher relations is another reason. I don't think EA appreciates this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 week ago (4 children) Been there too. I think it was Warner Brothers (at the time) that had a hissy fit about a review of a game. They didn't like the review: they wanted advertising rather than editorial. We told them to talk to the sales department. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 point 1 week ago (3 children) Do you remember which game it was? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago* (2 children) A very early Harry Potter game, 2001. Surprise, it was EA. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) Interesting. I actually remember this game very fondly. It's a well made mid-budget game for kids, in my opinion. Nothing groundbreaking, but charming, atmospheric and with fun gameplay. I was young when it came out, definitely part of the target audience (despite not caring about Harry Potter), but even revisiting it as an adult, I still found it to be enjoyable. Reading the Wikipedia article, I'm actually surprised by how low its review scores are. How did your magazine cover it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago Pretty much what you said, but that's from memory. The site and the review is long gone now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 point 1 week ago (5 children) Publisher relations is another reason. I don't think EA appreciates this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 week ago (4 children) Been there too. I think it was Warner Brothers (at the time) that had a hissy fit about a review of a game. They didn't like the review: they wanted advertising rather than editorial. We told them to talk to the sales department. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 point 1 week ago (3 children) Do you remember which game it was? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago* (2 children) A very early Harry Potter game, 2001. Surprise, it was EA. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) Interesting. I actually remember this game very fondly. It's a well made mid-budget game for kids, in my opinion. Nothing groundbreaking, but charming, atmospheric and with fun gameplay. I was young when it came out, definitely part of the target audience (despite not caring about Harry Potter), but even revisiting it as an adult, I still found it to be enjoyable. Reading the Wikipedia article, I'm actually surprised by how low its review scores are. How did your magazine cover it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago Pretty much what you said, but that's from memory. The site and the review is long gone now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 week ago (4 children) Been there too. I think it was Warner Brothers (at the time) that had a hissy fit about a review of a game. They didn't like the review: they wanted advertising rather than editorial. We told them to talk to the sales department. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 point 1 week ago (3 children) Do you remember which game it was? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago* (2 children) A very early Harry Potter game, 2001. Surprise, it was EA. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) Interesting. I actually remember this game very fondly. It's a well made mid-budget game for kids, in my opinion. Nothing groundbreaking, but charming, atmospheric and with fun gameplay. I was young when it came out, definitely part of the target audience (despite not caring about Harry Potter), but even revisiting it as an adult, I still found it to be enjoyable. Reading the Wikipedia article, I'm actually surprised by how low its review scores are. How did your magazine cover it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago Pretty much what you said, but that's from memory. The site and the review is long gone now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 point 1 week ago (3 children) Do you remember which game it was? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago* (2 children) A very early Harry Potter game, 2001. Surprise, it was EA. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) Interesting. I actually remember this game very fondly. It's a well made mid-budget game for kids, in my opinion. Nothing groundbreaking, but charming, atmospheric and with fun gameplay. I was young when it came out, definitely part of the target audience (despite not caring about Harry Potter), but even revisiting it as an adult, I still found it to be enjoyable. Reading the Wikipedia article, I'm actually surprised by how low its review scores are. How did your magazine cover it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago Pretty much what you said, but that's from memory. The site and the review is long gone now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago* (2 children) A very early Harry Potter game, 2001. Surprise, it was EA. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) Interesting. I actually remember this game very fondly. It's a well made mid-budget game for kids, in my opinion. Nothing groundbreaking, but charming, atmospheric and with fun gameplay. I was young when it came out, definitely part of the target audience (despite not caring about Harry Potter), but even revisiting it as an adult, I still found it to be enjoyable. Reading the Wikipedia article, I'm actually surprised by how low its review scores are. How did your magazine cover it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago Pretty much what you said, but that's from memory. The site and the review is long gone now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) Interesting. I actually remember this game very fondly. It's a well made mid-budget game for kids, in my opinion. Nothing groundbreaking, but charming, atmospheric and with fun gameplay. I was young when it came out, definitely part of the target audience (despite not caring about Harry Potter), but even revisiting it as an adult, I still found it to be enjoyable. Reading the Wikipedia article, I'm actually surprised by how low its review scores are. How did your magazine cover it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago Pretty much what you said, but that's from memory. The site and the review is long gone now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago Pretty much what you said, but that's from memory. The site and the review is long gone now. permalink fedilink source parent