All their responses are generated, no conscience there, just AI. "Another brick in the wall" hits stronger than ever now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 week ago (7 children)

Yes, but I don’t go blindfolded and I don’t have double standards. AI is the pinnacle of the system not a problem (get as much as you can from others without give something).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (6 children)

    since when is "i will not contribute to worsening the system i am forced to be a part of" a double standard? people need to eat. they do not need chatbots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (5 children)

    They don’t need a lot. They don’t need 3000cc cars, 2 closet of unused clothes, new iphone/android every year, etc etc. But guess what.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (3 children)

    The gimmicks I decribed are in the same category with the AI usage.

    Its double standard when your friend buys a new iphone every year, and you say nothing to him, but when they use AI you start the debate. Its based on stealing others countries minerals / work, and its bad for the planet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (2 children)

    ah, so you're making assumptions. i see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (1 child)

    No assumptions. This is how the modern society works. USA is 4% of the world's population and consumes around 25%. And it is just a country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago*

    you're making assumptions about people not saying anything, based on the (observed) behaviour of 4% of the population, and then, believing yourself to be the only one to either a) call people out and living as you're learning, or b) not caring even a bit, take an assumed moral high ground which given a) is amazingly narrow-minded, or given b) is downright disturbing.

    people do what they can, and they should be commended when they change for the better. a tool notably does what it's designed to do, and should be criticised if that thing is bad.

  • source
  • parent