Data center proponents generally argue that the facilities will provide jobs and sustain the American lead in the global AI race. Opponents, meanwhile, urge that the infrastructure projects are associated with dangerous pollution, spiking energy costs, and loss of natural land. And then, of course, there’s the noise.

“We don’t need a data center in a community, let alone two hyperscale data centers in a community of less than a population of 12,000 people,”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

Data center proponents generally argue that the facilities will provide jobs

This is the biggest bullshit lie they keep repeating everywhere they are planning to build these monstrosities.

The fact is it will create a few hundred, 400ish Construction worker jobs for the build of the site, which is finite maybe 2 years. Not a stable long term job and the people building it probably are contractors that would be building somewhere else if that build didn't exist.

Afterwards the data center only provides less than 50 full-time high paid jobs, because the operational demands are very low.

This in no way compares to a new steel mill or other large scale factory that will provide hundreds and hundreds of jobs for multiple generations.

This shit is just lining already rich and upper-class pockets with more money they don't need. Not providing the lower or middle-class, who need jobs the most, with a decent stable income that can carry to retirement.

This is basically your local government saying, fuck you I want mine. Well tricking the working class. The people who are suffering from unemployment brought on by the very same assholes. They are trying to give hollow promises, for a yes vote. Fucking puppets with a corporate hand up their ass.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    And yet it's always "we don't have the money for that" when it comes to fixing outdated infrastructure.

    There's always millions of dollars available to rip out existing infrastructure that benefits the public. Or to install anti-homeless architecture. But never any to build affordable housing and solve homelessness.

    When the public's taxpayer dollars are being handed to these corporations to actively make their lives worse, it's "creating jobs." When we ask for better sidewalks or efficiency apartments, it's "there's no money for that."

    Where did our tax dollars go then, huh?

    I'll give you a hint: look at any big tech company's quarterly earnings report.

  • source
  • parent