Some girls will consent, just as some boys will do.

I'd die happy being asphyxiated between a pretty girl's ass or tits. It's risky but I'd give my consent nevertheless. Stop being sexist by infantilizing girls.

Arguably it is. No one expects to be choked literally to death. Just like any other consent/consent play: you consent to being forced, within boundaries - and you really really need a safe word and/or other safeguards. As the dominant, you are morally responsible for adhering to those boundaries, ensuring the safety of your partner, and fulfilling whatever they expect to get from the play

Call me old fashioned

Regressive sexual moralizing is a red flag that a person is a huge piece of shit. "Old fashioned" is putting it lightly. Keep these awful options of yours between you and whatever regressive church you go to, creep.

Some kinks should be shamed.

Only the sick moralism kink that leads people to shame sex they wouldn't want to have themselves. That should definitely be shamed out of existence.

Knife / edge play is a legitimate kink.

It is possible to consent to being shot, yes. It is still illegal.

just like how it's possible to consent to taking illegal drugs or breaking the speed limit in a car

Does the UK government actually differentiate between simulated and actual? Isn't most porn "fake" anyway and should be presumed to be simulated?

Too bad they made "simulated" choking illegal then.

yes. no. no.

any other questions?

Disagree.

Some people are into that.