you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)

Training data is based on copyrighted material that is stolen. Someone should be made to pay somewhere. The theft of human thought cannot be allowed to be exploited.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Copyright violations aren't stealing. Human thought cannot be "stolen", only shared.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Human thought shared between humans cannot be stolen. A billionaire's company feeding a machine all human thought for purposes of replacing said human is absolutely theft.

    As for copyright, tell that to all the people fined for piracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Copyright violation is punishable by law, yes. But it's it's not theft.

    A billionaire's company feeding a machine all human thought for purposes of replacing said human is absolutely theft.

    It's immoral sure, but not theft. We don't need to equivocate to pass moral judgement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment