you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 47 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What about using both instead of being idiots who fight about which is better? They clearly have their use cases. We can use all kind of renewables to decommission coals and meanwhile build nuclear reactors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Because it can be accomplished without nuclear, meaning nuclear is a huge expense and a lot of toxic waste for no advantage?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

    Nuclear waste can mostly be reused and what remaiin can just be sealed off, also, they are experimentig with thorium rn which is a LOT more safe; you also ignore that solar energy uses a lot of terrain

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    And also the mining and manufacturing and disposal/recycling for the panels. They don't just pop into existence at the supply warehouse. Any full analysis should include the environmental entire manufacturing chain, regardless of whether it's solar, wind, or nuclear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment