▲ 871 ▼ Sacred fortune cookies (r1b.it) submitted 1 week ago by Mandarbmax@r1b.it to c/funny@sh.itjust.works 82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (4 children) You are participating in the problem by posting this. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lobut@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (3 children) Yeah, I feel like if we blurred the advertiser, we could get away with this point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (2 children) Does it not work to shame the advertiser? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago By default, it does not; the predatory nature of this particular company notwithstanding. For an extreme example, all I have to do to give a smoker a craving for a cigarette is too mention how bad it smells. It doesn't matter that I did it in a negative context, just that I mentioned it. For this company, a gambling company, which is known as addicting enough to ruin people, just sharing the company name is enough to cause similar affects. For regular companies the affect is also there, just in varying degrees of strong. As a lesser example, I could give you cravings by just mentioning a specific soft drink, so long as I guess the right brand. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago Is polymarket capable of shame? Is any company for that matter? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (3 children) Yeah, I feel like if we blurred the advertiser, we could get away with this point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (2 children) Does it not work to shame the advertiser? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago By default, it does not; the predatory nature of this particular company notwithstanding. For an extreme example, all I have to do to give a smoker a craving for a cigarette is too mention how bad it smells. It doesn't matter that I did it in a negative context, just that I mentioned it. For this company, a gambling company, which is known as addicting enough to ruin people, just sharing the company name is enough to cause similar affects. For regular companies the affect is also there, just in varying degrees of strong. As a lesser example, I could give you cravings by just mentioning a specific soft drink, so long as I guess the right brand. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago Is polymarket capable of shame? Is any company for that matter? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (2 children) Does it not work to shame the advertiser? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago By default, it does not; the predatory nature of this particular company notwithstanding. For an extreme example, all I have to do to give a smoker a craving for a cigarette is too mention how bad it smells. It doesn't matter that I did it in a negative context, just that I mentioned it. For this company, a gambling company, which is known as addicting enough to ruin people, just sharing the company name is enough to cause similar affects. For regular companies the affect is also there, just in varying degrees of strong. As a lesser example, I could give you cravings by just mentioning a specific soft drink, so long as I guess the right brand. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago Is polymarket capable of shame? Is any company for that matter? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago By default, it does not; the predatory nature of this particular company notwithstanding. For an extreme example, all I have to do to give a smoker a craving for a cigarette is too mention how bad it smells. It doesn't matter that I did it in a negative context, just that I mentioned it. For this company, a gambling company, which is known as addicting enough to ruin people, just sharing the company name is enough to cause similar affects. For regular companies the affect is also there, just in varying degrees of strong. As a lesser example, I could give you cravings by just mentioning a specific soft drink, so long as I guess the right brand. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago Is polymarket capable of shame? Is any company for that matter? permalink fedilink source parent