▲ 775 ▼ this is the start of everything falling apart, i can feel it (media.fedia.io) submitted 2 weeks ago by QuantumEraser@fedia.io to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 262 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 58 points 2 weeks ago (25 children) You can get a lot done when you've got 29 months in a year permalink fedilink source hideshow 25 child comments replies: [–] QuantumEraser@fedia.io [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago Yeah sorry about that, was the default format in my spreadsheet software and I didn't think to change it permalink fedilink source parent [–] qarbone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (23 children) ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 23 child comments replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) The weird US American Date scheme is not used in most of the world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) I wish. Am European. I know one person that voluntarily uses their date and time formats. For reasons I will never comprehend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) He or she must enjoy the endless confusion and friction in the interaction with others. That said, some idiotic IT systems use the US format to. Causes a lot of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* I'm in the US and have had problems with C-level douches misreading dd-mm-yyyy dates in some system we had that logged in that format and freaking out (and also missing that the log time stamps were in UTC-0, causing further confusion/freakout) Anyway, this is part of why I always use yyyy-mm-dd, because nobody will confuse that date string for any other date, and everyone who can understand dates at all will be able to read it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] blackshirt@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (15 children) D/M/Y > M/D/Y permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) There is only YYYYMMDD permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) sadly for everyone that’s factually incorrect, but the phrase DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY does not preclude YYYYMMDD > DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago your pedantery is apreciated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (11 children) Because one lives the other should not long live Y-M-D permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) NO. You need a character per digit and you always want the leading 0 shown. YYYY-MM-DD permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) At least it makes my folders really easy to sort through... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago Only if you leave the leading zeros! permalink fedilink source parent [–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) ISO 8601 is the only correct way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago It's close, sure, but actually no. That standard currently requires the letter T (and no white-space) between date and time when both are present, and, frankly, that's ugly and a space should be allowed. An old version of the standard allowed the space, and GNU's coreutils seem to have carried on the tradition, so I'm not alone in thinking this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] blackshirt@lemmy.world 1 point 2 weeks ago (5 children) OP's graph uses slashes. Dashes would remove all the confusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children) No because it's the global format that typically uses periods. D.M.Y (normal) Y-M-D (superior) M/D/Y (mental illness) Mixing up the formats and denominators makes this mess even worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) you should also always specify YYYY-MM-DD because often M and D ignores leading zeros, YY means the 2 digit suffix, and Y… well, i don’t even know what that is but i’m sure it’s something less specific than YYYY if we’re going to be picky about being clear about things, let’s be truly clear about things permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) YYYYY would be something like "The Year of Our Lord, Two-Thousand and Twenty-Six" (or probably just "Twenty Twenty-Six", but the other is more ridiculous so I'll go with that) Y would just be "6" but I can't think of any context where that would ever be used permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago i reckon Y might be something like years since 1970 or some other epoch (we do things like week number of the year, day number of the year, etc so i think that’s kinda similar) permalink fedilink source parent [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago Yep, I do it in every format. Just kept it short for readability. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) The dates below the graph permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] mcv@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago Pretty much only in the US. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [+] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org -10 points 2 weeks ago Some BS AI "visionaries" keep blurting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuantumEraser@fedia.io [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago Yeah sorry about that, was the default format in my spreadsheet software and I didn't think to change it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (23 children) ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 23 child comments replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) The weird US American Date scheme is not used in most of the world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) I wish. Am European. I know one person that voluntarily uses their date and time formats. For reasons I will never comprehend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) He or she must enjoy the endless confusion and friction in the interaction with others. That said, some idiotic IT systems use the US format to. Causes a lot of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* I'm in the US and have had problems with C-level douches misreading dd-mm-yyyy dates in some system we had that logged in that format and freaking out (and also missing that the log time stamps were in UTC-0, causing further confusion/freakout) Anyway, this is part of why I always use yyyy-mm-dd, because nobody will confuse that date string for any other date, and everyone who can understand dates at all will be able to read it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] blackshirt@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (15 children) D/M/Y > M/D/Y permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) There is only YYYYMMDD permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) sadly for everyone that’s factually incorrect, but the phrase DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY does not preclude YYYYMMDD > DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago your pedantery is apreciated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (11 children) Because one lives the other should not long live Y-M-D permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) NO. You need a character per digit and you always want the leading 0 shown. YYYY-MM-DD permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) At least it makes my folders really easy to sort through... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago Only if you leave the leading zeros! permalink fedilink source parent [–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) ISO 8601 is the only correct way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago It's close, sure, but actually no. That standard currently requires the letter T (and no white-space) between date and time when both are present, and, frankly, that's ugly and a space should be allowed. An old version of the standard allowed the space, and GNU's coreutils seem to have carried on the tradition, so I'm not alone in thinking this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] blackshirt@lemmy.world 1 point 2 weeks ago (5 children) OP's graph uses slashes. Dashes would remove all the confusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children) No because it's the global format that typically uses periods. D.M.Y (normal) Y-M-D (superior) M/D/Y (mental illness) Mixing up the formats and denominators makes this mess even worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) you should also always specify YYYY-MM-DD because often M and D ignores leading zeros, YY means the 2 digit suffix, and Y… well, i don’t even know what that is but i’m sure it’s something less specific than YYYY if we’re going to be picky about being clear about things, let’s be truly clear about things permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) YYYYY would be something like "The Year of Our Lord, Two-Thousand and Twenty-Six" (or probably just "Twenty Twenty-Six", but the other is more ridiculous so I'll go with that) Y would just be "6" but I can't think of any context where that would ever be used permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago i reckon Y might be something like years since 1970 or some other epoch (we do things like week number of the year, day number of the year, etc so i think that’s kinda similar) permalink fedilink source parent [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago Yep, I do it in every format. Just kept it short for readability. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) The dates below the graph permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] mcv@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago Pretty much only in the US. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [+] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org -10 points 2 weeks ago Some BS AI "visionaries" keep blurting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) The weird US American Date scheme is not used in most of the world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) I wish. Am European. I know one person that voluntarily uses their date and time formats. For reasons I will never comprehend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) He or she must enjoy the endless confusion and friction in the interaction with others. That said, some idiotic IT systems use the US format to. Causes a lot of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* I'm in the US and have had problems with C-level douches misreading dd-mm-yyyy dates in some system we had that logged in that format and freaking out (and also missing that the log time stamps were in UTC-0, causing further confusion/freakout) Anyway, this is part of why I always use yyyy-mm-dd, because nobody will confuse that date string for any other date, and everyone who can understand dates at all will be able to read it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) I wish. Am European. I know one person that voluntarily uses their date and time formats. For reasons I will never comprehend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) He or she must enjoy the endless confusion and friction in the interaction with others. That said, some idiotic IT systems use the US format to. Causes a lot of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* I'm in the US and have had problems with C-level douches misreading dd-mm-yyyy dates in some system we had that logged in that format and freaking out (and also missing that the log time stamps were in UTC-0, causing further confusion/freakout) Anyway, this is part of why I always use yyyy-mm-dd, because nobody will confuse that date string for any other date, and everyone who can understand dates at all will be able to read it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) He or she must enjoy the endless confusion and friction in the interaction with others. That said, some idiotic IT systems use the US format to. Causes a lot of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* I'm in the US and have had problems with C-level douches misreading dd-mm-yyyy dates in some system we had that logged in that format and freaking out (and also missing that the log time stamps were in UTC-0, causing further confusion/freakout) Anyway, this is part of why I always use yyyy-mm-dd, because nobody will confuse that date string for any other date, and everyone who can understand dates at all will be able to read it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* I'm in the US and have had problems with C-level douches misreading dd-mm-yyyy dates in some system we had that logged in that format and freaking out (and also missing that the log time stamps were in UTC-0, causing further confusion/freakout) Anyway, this is part of why I always use yyyy-mm-dd, because nobody will confuse that date string for any other date, and everyone who can understand dates at all will be able to read it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blackshirt@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (15 children) D/M/Y > M/D/Y permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) There is only YYYYMMDD permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) sadly for everyone that’s factually incorrect, but the phrase DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY does not preclude YYYYMMDD > DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago your pedantery is apreciated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (11 children) Because one lives the other should not long live Y-M-D permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) NO. You need a character per digit and you always want the leading 0 shown. YYYY-MM-DD permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) At least it makes my folders really easy to sort through... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago Only if you leave the leading zeros! permalink fedilink source parent [–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) ISO 8601 is the only correct way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago It's close, sure, but actually no. That standard currently requires the letter T (and no white-space) between date and time when both are present, and, frankly, that's ugly and a space should be allowed. An old version of the standard allowed the space, and GNU's coreutils seem to have carried on the tradition, so I'm not alone in thinking this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] blackshirt@lemmy.world 1 point 2 weeks ago (5 children) OP's graph uses slashes. Dashes would remove all the confusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children) No because it's the global format that typically uses periods. D.M.Y (normal) Y-M-D (superior) M/D/Y (mental illness) Mixing up the formats and denominators makes this mess even worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) you should also always specify YYYY-MM-DD because often M and D ignores leading zeros, YY means the 2 digit suffix, and Y… well, i don’t even know what that is but i’m sure it’s something less specific than YYYY if we’re going to be picky about being clear about things, let’s be truly clear about things permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) YYYYY would be something like "The Year of Our Lord, Two-Thousand and Twenty-Six" (or probably just "Twenty Twenty-Six", but the other is more ridiculous so I'll go with that) Y would just be "6" but I can't think of any context where that would ever be used permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago i reckon Y might be something like years since 1970 or some other epoch (we do things like week number of the year, day number of the year, etc so i think that’s kinda similar) permalink fedilink source parent [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago Yep, I do it in every format. Just kept it short for readability. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) There is only YYYYMMDD permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) sadly for everyone that’s factually incorrect, but the phrase DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY does not preclude YYYYMMDD > DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago your pedantery is apreciated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) sadly for everyone that’s factually incorrect, but the phrase DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY does not preclude YYYYMMDD > DD/MM/YYYY > MM/DD/YYYY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago your pedantery is apreciated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago your pedantery is apreciated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (11 children) Because one lives the other should not long live Y-M-D permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) NO. You need a character per digit and you always want the leading 0 shown. YYYY-MM-DD permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) At least it makes my folders really easy to sort through... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago Only if you leave the leading zeros! permalink fedilink source parent [–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) ISO 8601 is the only correct way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago It's close, sure, but actually no. That standard currently requires the letter T (and no white-space) between date and time when both are present, and, frankly, that's ugly and a space should be allowed. An old version of the standard allowed the space, and GNU's coreutils seem to have carried on the tradition, so I'm not alone in thinking this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] blackshirt@lemmy.world 1 point 2 weeks ago (5 children) OP's graph uses slashes. Dashes would remove all the confusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children) No because it's the global format that typically uses periods. D.M.Y (normal) Y-M-D (superior) M/D/Y (mental illness) Mixing up the formats and denominators makes this mess even worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) you should also always specify YYYY-MM-DD because often M and D ignores leading zeros, YY means the 2 digit suffix, and Y… well, i don’t even know what that is but i’m sure it’s something less specific than YYYY if we’re going to be picky about being clear about things, let’s be truly clear about things permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) YYYYY would be something like "The Year of Our Lord, Two-Thousand and Twenty-Six" (or probably just "Twenty Twenty-Six", but the other is more ridiculous so I'll go with that) Y would just be "6" but I can't think of any context where that would ever be used permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago i reckon Y might be something like years since 1970 or some other epoch (we do things like week number of the year, day number of the year, etc so i think that’s kinda similar) permalink fedilink source parent [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago Yep, I do it in every format. Just kept it short for readability. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) NO. You need a character per digit and you always want the leading 0 shown. YYYY-MM-DD permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) At least it makes my folders really easy to sort through... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago Only if you leave the leading zeros! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) At least it makes my folders really easy to sort through... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago Only if you leave the leading zeros! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago Only if you leave the leading zeros! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) ISO 8601 is the only correct way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago It's close, sure, but actually no. That standard currently requires the letter T (and no white-space) between date and time when both are present, and, frankly, that's ugly and a space should be allowed. An old version of the standard allowed the space, and GNU's coreutils seem to have carried on the tradition, so I'm not alone in thinking this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago It's close, sure, but actually no. That standard currently requires the letter T (and no white-space) between date and time when both are present, and, frankly, that's ugly and a space should be allowed. An old version of the standard allowed the space, and GNU's coreutils seem to have carried on the tradition, so I'm not alone in thinking this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blackshirt@lemmy.world 1 point 2 weeks ago (5 children) OP's graph uses slashes. Dashes would remove all the confusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children) No because it's the global format that typically uses periods. D.M.Y (normal) Y-M-D (superior) M/D/Y (mental illness) Mixing up the formats and denominators makes this mess even worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) you should also always specify YYYY-MM-DD because often M and D ignores leading zeros, YY means the 2 digit suffix, and Y… well, i don’t even know what that is but i’m sure it’s something less specific than YYYY if we’re going to be picky about being clear about things, let’s be truly clear about things permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) YYYYY would be something like "The Year of Our Lord, Two-Thousand and Twenty-Six" (or probably just "Twenty Twenty-Six", but the other is more ridiculous so I'll go with that) Y would just be "6" but I can't think of any context where that would ever be used permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago i reckon Y might be something like years since 1970 or some other epoch (we do things like week number of the year, day number of the year, etc so i think that’s kinda similar) permalink fedilink source parent [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago Yep, I do it in every format. Just kept it short for readability. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children) No because it's the global format that typically uses periods. D.M.Y (normal) Y-M-D (superior) M/D/Y (mental illness) Mixing up the formats and denominators makes this mess even worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) you should also always specify YYYY-MM-DD because often M and D ignores leading zeros, YY means the 2 digit suffix, and Y… well, i don’t even know what that is but i’m sure it’s something less specific than YYYY if we’re going to be picky about being clear about things, let’s be truly clear about things permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) YYYYY would be something like "The Year of Our Lord, Two-Thousand and Twenty-Six" (or probably just "Twenty Twenty-Six", but the other is more ridiculous so I'll go with that) Y would just be "6" but I can't think of any context where that would ever be used permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago i reckon Y might be something like years since 1970 or some other epoch (we do things like week number of the year, day number of the year, etc so i think that’s kinda similar) permalink fedilink source parent [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago Yep, I do it in every format. Just kept it short for readability. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children) you should also always specify YYYY-MM-DD because often M and D ignores leading zeros, YY means the 2 digit suffix, and Y… well, i don’t even know what that is but i’m sure it’s something less specific than YYYY if we’re going to be picky about being clear about things, let’s be truly clear about things permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) YYYYY would be something like "The Year of Our Lord, Two-Thousand and Twenty-Six" (or probably just "Twenty Twenty-Six", but the other is more ridiculous so I'll go with that) Y would just be "6" but I can't think of any context where that would ever be used permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago i reckon Y might be something like years since 1970 or some other epoch (we do things like week number of the year, day number of the year, etc so i think that’s kinda similar) permalink fedilink source parent [–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago Yep, I do it in every format. Just kept it short for readability. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) YYYYY would be something like "The Year of Our Lord, Two-Thousand and Twenty-Six" (or probably just "Twenty Twenty-Six", but the other is more ridiculous so I'll go with that) Y would just be "6" but I can't think of any context where that would ever be used permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago i reckon Y might be something like years since 1970 or some other epoch (we do things like week number of the year, day number of the year, etc so i think that’s kinda similar) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago i reckon Y might be something like years since 1970 or some other epoch (we do things like week number of the year, day number of the year, etc so i think that’s kinda similar) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago Yep, I do it in every format. Just kept it short for readability. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) The dates below the graph permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] mcv@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago Pretty much only in the US. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] mcv@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jiral@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago Pretty much only in the US. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago Pretty much only in the US. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org -10 points 2 weeks ago Some BS AI "visionaries" keep blurting. permalink fedilink source parent