I think the community in question should decide to punish wrongdoers how they see fit on a case by case basis.
literally what he describes earlier in that video…
situation that I have no part in.
wait, you're not anarchist?
Australia
[…] shaming or public ridicule[…]
exclusion from the community (eg to a particular outstation or another community, or more rarely, total exclusion).[112]
exclusion from use of facilities[118]
exile to an outstation or another community.[119]
Nigeria
public shaming, corporal correction, spiritual rites, banishment, and, in some contexts under later influences, corporal fines prescribed by Islamic or colonial law [5].
shaming, and ritual highly credible - the threat of ostracism or spiritual sanction supplied strong social incentives for compliance [5].
creating hybrid institutions (community courts, ADR schemes) that combine customary legitimacy with statutory safeguards [8, 9].
6.1.2. Social Regulation Through Banishment and Ostracism
Banishment served as a major sanction for offenses that carried spiritual pollution or posed a continuing threat to communal safety. According to Nadel [5], offenders guilty of morally dangerous acts-such as sacrilege or persistent violence-could be expelled from the community. Ostracism, a milder variant, was used for kinship violations including incest or breaches of marriage norms. These exclusionary practices embodied the African belief that wrongdoing disrupts both social and spiritual equilibrium [1, 4]. By physically or socially removing the offender, the Nupe community sought to restore balance and avoid misfortune.
Literally imprisonment.
Do you think a bedroom or a closet is an institution?'
The institution is the guardians, the physical cages, the perpetrators, and the victims.
It’s only the institution surrounding it that differentiates a jail cell from (an often boringly decorated) bedroom.
so like a third party doing this, instead of the folks affected by the wrong doing?