42
Can someone fill me in on the ziq-anark drama? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Source: https://raddle.me/f/Anarchy/217949/the-anark-led-badjacketing-campaign-has-started-because-i

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 week ago (9 children)

"laws", "reparations", "constitutions", "justice".

People calling themselves anarchists have always been the hipster thing to do, the "I'm totally radical" without any self critique.

This is how anarchy looks like in regards to prisons, specially relevant because they do mention Anark:

https://anarchistnews.org/content/you-cant-build-anarchy-building-prisons-against-carceral-imagination

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (8 children)

    “laws”, “reparations”, “constitutions”, “justice”.

    which have exact meanings in anarchist theory, where Anark went out of his way to distinguish. Do you assume anarchist society don't have rules, baseline rules everyone is beholden to, reparative work for wrong doings, and a justice process?

    https://anarchistnews.org/content/you-cant-build-anarchy-building-prisons-against-carceral-imagination

    This is the same essay Anark is referencing🤦‍♀️. Why not cite Bakunin, heck even Kropotkin‽ Why rereference the essay we have already read is being questioned for both legitimacy and reparative & rehabilitative justice?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (7 children)

    Because anarchy is not the question of reparative and rehabilitative justice, that's cop talk. Justice is a liberal proposition, if you want to do anarchy, you must think bigger not liberal+.

    If you want to talk justice, constitution, law, etc you can join your local social democracy party. Just stop calling yourself anarchist, stop diluting words.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (6 children)

    Ok, I see my mistake: You can't read, and you don't comprehend “without hierarchy.”

    Later demagogue🖕

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    "it's not a forest, it's a stationary non-animal life."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)

    “The forest was shrinking but the trees kept voting for the axe, for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because his handle was made of wood he was one of them.” —Turkish Proverbs

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    You do realize that wanting anarchy but supporting secret police and prisons makes you the tree voting for the axe, right?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    I am not a Leninist. You observed that correctly! Now explain to !Anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com why revolutionaries should ignore their oppressors’ information gathering?

    Disengage me from it. I have gathered enough from you to be aware you don't know anything about revolutionary action.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •