claiming that it’s in the “living memory” for half of Germans is just factually wrong and shows that you have no idea what you’re talking about.
You have no clue about Germany and you underestimate holocaust education.
What does “concrete interactions” mean, and how is it different from “material relations?”
It's not any different and I did not debate the thought of material relations.
then calling me a “fool” for valuing vaccines so highly is stupid and meaningless.
I called you a fool because you said they are mankind's greatest achievement. That is objectively foolish
"Materialism is when you believe in mysticism"
I did not say that, nor do I believe in mysticism. I believe in investigating that which appears mystical, that was my point. You idiot. Quit putting words in my mouth, you are proving more and more with every message how disingenuous your approach is.
moralist
Is it wrong for me to be?
Yes, science does not operate on morals. You claim to be interested in a social science of sorts.
The PRC literally doubled life expectancy within a generation.
So did other countries in (a similar way at least) that developed extremely quickly, like Japan and so on. China is not special and it was in the interest of China to maximise their population potential to get ahead in state-state competition.
What on earth are you talking about? Please stop “guessing” about my views,
I don't have to guess your views, they're atrocious enough.