581
New Executive Order:AI must agree on the Administration views on Sex,Race, cant mention what they deem to be Critical Race Theory,Unconscious Bias,Intersectionality,Systemic Racism or "Transgenderism (www.whitehouse.gov)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/34629331

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

No. You would use a base model (GPT-4o) to get a reliable language model to which you would add a set of rules that the chat bot follows. Every company has its own rules, it is already widely in use to add data like company-specific manuals and support documents. Not rocketscience at all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So many examples of this method failing I don't even know where to start. Most visible, of course, was how that approach failed to stop Grok from "being woke" for like, a year or more.

    Frankly, you sound like you're talking straight out of your ass.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sure, it can go wrong, it is not fool-proof. Just like building a new model can cause unwanted surprises.

    BTW. There are many theories about Grok's unethical behavior but this one is new to me. The reasons I was familiar with are: unfiltered training data, no ethical output restrictions, programming errors or incorrect system maintenance, strategic errors (Elon!), publishing before proper testing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •