82
Wikipedia’s Pyrrhic Victory (www.newyorker.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

One “very senior Wikimedian,” we are told, “came to think of the project as a ‘city built by Asperger’s.’ ”

If you get the paywall, it's readable at http://archive.today/R2rnW

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

The reason I down voted you is you're ignoring duplicative information...

And mainly because instead of asking questions to learn, you just went off with a halfbaked thought and presented it like it was fact.

Do better

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    I certainly ignored "duplicative information", because I don't even know what those words are supposed to mean.

    You haven't asked any questions either, you made up a claim and are now seemingly very insulted when an obvious correction is pointed out. Those two sites contain hundreds upon hundreds of thosands of entire books, entire encyclopedias, and god knows how many scientific articles, inevitably way more stuff than Wikipedia. Every Wikipedia editor should have them open in a tab while editing ready to verify the existing sources and look for new ones.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (7 children)

    because I don’t even know what those words are supposed to mean.

    How many websites about Pokemon do you think are archived?

    How much of that info is duplicative (meaning it exists multiple times)?

    If 2 gigs of data all says charmander evolves into charazard, why is that worth more than a single text string saying it once?

    You haven’t asked any questions either

    I already understand it...

    You don't even know what "duplicative" means, and were too lazy to even look it up, you just wanted to argue about how your opinion matters more than facts.

    marked by duplication

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/duplicative

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    With no context I didn't know what you might have meant by "duplicative information". Now it makes sense, apparently you think Internet Archive is just Wayback Machine, with its archived duplicate Pokemon websites. Which is comically false, try to dial down your arrogance. Perhaps you could have asked questions about whether I really think Internet Archive's collection of Pokemon sites contains more knowledge than Wikipedia, or maybe something else:

    As of July 2013, the Internet Archive was operating 33 scanning centers in five countries, digitizing about 1,000 books a day for a total of more than 2 million books, in a total collection of 4.4 million books – including material digitized by others and fed into the Internet Archive

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    What did they do with the books after they scanned them?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Made them free to access and download, if the book is in the public domain or under a Creative Commons license. Allowed limited access if copyrighted (through some weirdly legal solution where they technically "loan" the book to you while you view it in your browser), although that option has been partly limited in the recent years due to lawsuits by book publishers.

    https://archive.org/details/texts

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Congrats bud.

    You kept going long enough I'll never try to clarify anything for you again, every single reply you make to one of my comments from here on out will not receive any further clarification and you'll always believe it's 100% correct.

    It won't be, but I won't see it to tell you that anymore.

    So you win, enjoy it.

    Edit:

    2-0 bud!

    Apparently I blocked your original account already, the streak continues

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •