worked on it since 1998

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -10 points 2 weeks ago* (3 children)

You can see that people don't really want to know, what they want to do is to continue to believe that this tool is good. A tool that they did not build, they do not use, and they cannot evaluate against the comparative pro tools.

I'm not wasting my breath on this bullshit.

I've never in my entire life of professional digital media and development known an artist who would ever use gimp. Because it is utter feces.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    I've never in my entire life of professional digital media and development known an artist who would ever use gimp. Because it is utter feces.

    No, you've not known anyone who used it mainly because industries do not spend $600 on software per seat and then later admit that It was barely better than a free tool, even if that were true.

    You claim not to be trying to squabble but an objective observer would conclude that's the only thing you've done here.

  • source
  • parent