you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 104 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Although the jury concluded that Meta had over 43 million violations of the state’s unfair practices act, with each transgression carrying a civil penalty as high as $5,000, a New Mexico judge was responsible for determining the ultimate fine. The Wednesday filing showed that the state was awarded $219.5 billion, but the penalty was ultimately reduced to $25 billion.

So the $25 billion judgment is a judicial reduction from the jury award of $219.5 billion.

I also like this decision from the judge:

The judge added that interest on the penalty shall accrue at the rate of 15% each year until the fine is paid off in full.

Meta will likely appeal, but not only does that not guarantee a reduction in the judgment, if they drag this out for years, New Mexico gets paid out even more.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    the state was awarded $219.5 billion, but the penalty was ultimately reduced to $25 billion.

    would have been a better headline, tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago* (6 children)

    Meh, I like the $25 billion headline because its the realistic result of the trial. Citing the $219.5 billion number in the headline would be clickbait because, while true with specific verbiage, it doesn't actually have any impact or expectation of that award actually occurring.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    No, I mean more like "Meta to pay just 10% of original fine" - So people get an idea of how their judiciary system really works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Even that would be clickbait though, because $219.5 billion isn't the "original fine", its the jury guidance. Its part of the sausage making of the justice system. The jury has a range of the fine per incident they can choose from to suggest a judgment. The judge then uses that jury guidance with additional info to determine the actual judgement. In this case $25 billion is the "original fine".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    You're technically correct, but I still disagree with you on this. My reasoning is that I think the real story here is that meta has wormed its way out of being punished adequately, again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is where it becomes subjective. For some,Meta being "punished adequately" would mean the complete liquidation of the company and charges for executives in front of the International Criminal Court in the Hague for crimes against humanity.

    A $25 billion award would be 41% of Meta's annual profit. That is substantial!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I doubt New Mexico will ever see the money.

    What are they going to do to actually punish Facebook for not paying?

    Large corporations are somewhat immune from actual consequence these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments