I had to trim my screenshots due to being a mod elsewhere, so I can see mod names. I think the screenshot of the interaction really sums this one up. I initially commented after a brief skim of the article, basically enough time to figure out that it wasn't spewing great replacement bullshit, and then gave a little reminder that ecofascism is real and uses language such as "humans are parasites".

OP responded with a suspicious comment, and another comment pointed out the author's true intent, so I went looking deeper. At the very last part of the article, like 3rd to last sentence in the last paragraph, the author calls for a "non-coerceive" means to kill 70% of the human race. I called it out, and was banned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

oh yea, we could provide for more than 10 billion people if we didn't produce goods (especially food) in comically wasteful ways

also, for having listened to people like this before… you just know which 70% of humanity these people want to elimitate. and it's not the ones most responsible for climate destruction!

  • source
  • parent