I had to trim my screenshots due to being a mod elsewhere, so I can see mod names. I think the screenshot of the interaction really sums this one up. I initially commented after a brief skim of the article, basically enough time to figure out that it wasn't spewing great replacement bullshit, and then gave a little reminder that ecofascism is real and uses language such as "humans are parasites".

OP responded with a suspicious comment, and another comment pointed out the author's true intent, so I went looking deeper. At the very last part of the article, like 3rd to last sentence in the last paragraph, the author calls for a "non-coerceive" means to kill 70% of the human race. I called it out, and was banned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

All posts should follow this basic structure

should follow

Should

This is a loose structure. For the most part, I followed it.

On points 1 and 3, I didn't de-obfuscate. I added obfuscation, to reduce the brigading that still happened, because we're dealing with a fascist in our space here. On point 5, there is not much to remedy unless the mod is removed.

Edit: ok, it really bothers me that you're getting pissy about point 3. I explicitly explained why I edited the screenshot. Literally first sentence.

I had to trim my screenshots due to being a mod elsewhere, so I can see mod names.

  • source
  • parent